Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160404
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 18 '19 at 08:19
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	63%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 71.4 2-Core 167 65% 109 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 297 36% 279 Pts	64-Core 318 20% 318 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.69% Terrible	Lighting 4.33 Reflection 4.31 Parallax 4.16 4% 4.27 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.09 4% 4.69 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.69% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V Series 128GB 244 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: E120506a SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 133 139 149 136 148 MB/s Performing below potential (89^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.6% Below average	Read 192 Write 117 Mixed 152 SusWrite 137 34% 150 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 40 4K Mixed 20.1 71% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 19.2 DQ Write 54.8 DQ Mixed 30.2 25% 34.7 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 45%
Hitachi HDS721025CLA682 250GB 1,787 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 227GB free Firmware: JP1OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 126 126 125 129 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Read 130 Write 123 Mixed 65.2 SusWrite 126 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 75%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 5GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 18 16 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 12.8 Mixed 19.1 SusWrite 17.2 25% 20 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 61% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4G1 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 16JTF25664AZ-1G4G1 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.2% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 14.8 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 15.2 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,776x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	275x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	238x

RAM
9905584-014.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 436 samples	38x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	37x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	22x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16