Asus PRIME A320M-K/BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K/BR (all builds)
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190801
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '19 at 23:04
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135 127,344 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 117 2-Core 224 80% 142 Pts	4-Core 403 8-Core 616 63% 509 Pts	64-Core 610 38% 610 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU) 44,235 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Asus(1043 876B) 3GB Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.8.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Lighting 20.8 Reflection 18.1 Parallax 31.6 17% 23.5 fps	MRender 16.1 Gravity 22.9 Splatting 21.3 17% 20.1 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
PNY SSD2SC240G1SA754D117-820 240GB 3,306 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: N0815B SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 297 186 300 303 297 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 96%
Samsung HD252HJ 250GB 8,167 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 26GB free Firmware: 1AC01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 96 97 95 95 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 88.7 Write 94.7 Mixed 59.3 SusWrite 96.3 62% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 58%
Samsung HD321HJ 320GB 5,512 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 32GB free Firmware: 1AC01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 63 62 60 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 65.6 Write 64.8 Mixed 44 SusWrite 61.4 43% 58.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSEK.8FBD 2x8GB 3,030 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 37.4 MC Write 39 MC Mixed 33.6 105% 36.7 GB/s	SC Read 25.9 SC Write 43.6 SC Mixed 29.8 95% 33.1 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K/BR Builds (Compare 932 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K/BR

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	118x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	89x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	85x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	60x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	59x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	58x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	97x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	56x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	41x

RAM
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GBTeamBench 78%, 7,481 samples	38x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	24x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $233

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16