Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics91.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '19 at 22:03
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7740X-$281
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 158
2-Core 315
103% 190 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 865
89% 716 Pts
64-Core 864
54% 864 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 101%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 120
Parallax 112
95% 116 fps
MRender 99.4
Gravity 105
Splatting 106
85% 104 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 481 424 418 429 404 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 489
Mixed 403
SusWrite 439
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 65.4
222% 78.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 132%
Great: 134%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
506GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 170 169 162 161 166 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 136
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 166
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 96%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 90 92 93 93 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 128
Write 108
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 90.7
74% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 87%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
795GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 117 117 119 119 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 110
Write 73.5
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 117
69% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 83%
WD Elements 25A3 6TB
5.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 188 191 188 190 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 168
Mixed 126
SusWrite 189
227% 171 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.7
415% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.6
DQ Mixed 0.6
348% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M2C3000C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2747 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 28.6
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 28.4
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 54.8
73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,131
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback