Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 9  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '19 at 19:55
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 136
2-Core 243
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 573
60% 482 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 139F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 128
Reflection 104
Parallax 112
104% 114 fps
Gravity 112
Splatting 93.1
89% 102 fps
Poor: 105% Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,184
Write 1,452
Mixed 921
334% 1519 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 74.9
256% 92.6 MB/s
DQ Read 966
DQ Write 988
DQ Mixed 953
723% 969 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
51GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,777
Write 1,403
Mixed 651
282% 1,277 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 41
165% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1117
DQ Write 889
DQ Mixed 810
658% 938 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
159GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 313 294 295 296 294 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 310
Write 335
Mixed 316
SusWrite 302
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 32.6
111% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 218
155% 200 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
250GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 417 356 79 83 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 430
Write 401
Mixed 337
SusWrite 236
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 40.3
136% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 359
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 79 74 77 79 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 14
Write 56.5
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 76
31% 42.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 114%
Seagate SkyHawk 4TB (2016)-$90
1TB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 98 102 103 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 92
Write 92.5
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 102
62% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 107%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
408GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 104 104 102 106 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 61.8
Write 91
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 102
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
188% 2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
798GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 157 153 157 157 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 99.7
Write 138
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 155
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.6
220% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 16 20 20 27 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 108
Write 142
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 22.1
65% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.6
235% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 92%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 2TB
139GB free
Firmware: 0302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 91 83 85 83 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 128
Write 96.3
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 85.4
68% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.1
225% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW8GX4M1D3000C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 21.7
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 12.6
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $854
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback