Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '19 at 18:38
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 88.9
1-Core 129
2-Core 246
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 813
76% 630 Pts
64-Core 1,018
63% 1,018 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2001) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9942
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Lighting 64.8
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 59.8
53% 64.7 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 59.6
Splatting 61.4
52% 64 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E128 128GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C270902
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 151 140 141 142 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 478
Write 394
Mixed 371
SusWrite 144
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 44.9
151% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 112
127% 217 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 93%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 122 123 123 123 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 117
Write 121
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 122
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 22.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 26.1
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 82%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback