Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180620
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '19 at 17:12
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 45%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 80.8
1-Core 119
2-Core 234
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 632
67% 535 Pts
64-Core 595
37% 595 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Asus(1043 8706) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 144
Parallax 142
125% 146 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 130
Splatting 105
108% 137 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 115%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 469
Write 438
Mixed 361
94% 423 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 49.8
167% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 354
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46
330GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 405 361 362 366 343 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 424
Mixed 416
SusWrite 372
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 43
144% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 279
228% 325 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 101%
Great: 125%
WD Elements 1TB
660GB free, PID 10a8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 26 27 9.1 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 21.2
Write 33.2
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 26.2
38% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
48% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
78.7% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 26.3
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 23.2
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 2,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $634
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback