Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	81.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	92.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140403
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '19 at 15:08
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 73.2 2-Core 142 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 407 42% 337 Pts	64-Core 346 21% 346 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 5173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.4% Excellent	Lighting 101 Reflection 113 Parallax 92.9 82% 102 fps	MRender 96.1 Gravity 95.3 Splatting 101 80% 97.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 178 174 177 171 173 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Read 485 Write 445 Mixed 392 SusWrite 202 85% 381 MB/s	4K Read 37.2 4K Write 75.5 4K Mixed 47.4 157% 53.4 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 243 DQ Mixed 258 194% 258 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 779GB free Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 147 149 148 148 144 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	Read 192 Write 173 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 146 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 112%
Seagate ST9640320AS 640GB-$270 5,562 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 595GB free Firmware: 0002HPM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 83 84 83 83 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 81.2 Write 77.7 Mixed 48.5 SusWrite 82.4 53% 72.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 49%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 410GB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 61 73 68 74 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	25% Poor	Read 21 Write 11.7 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 66.3 23% 31.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 30% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 112%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB 1,144 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2.5TB free, PID ab38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 91 92 101 93 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 65.7 Write 90.3 Mixed 87.8 SusWrite 94.3 120% 84.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.6 207% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 22,320 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.4% Average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 16.5 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 12.8 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	379x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	43x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $729

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16