Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	17.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel T2130 243 User benchmarks, average bench 28% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	30.7% Below average	Memory 59.8 1-Core 11.6 2-Core 16.9 24% 29.4 Pts	4-Core 11.9 8-Core 24.8 2% 18.3 Pts	64-Core 28.2 2% 28.2 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon Xpress 1200 Sanyo(144D C511) 256MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.2 Reflection 0.19 0% 0.2 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
JAJS300M120C 120GB 386 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0925A SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 51 116 106 103 78 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.2% Very poor	Read 155 Write 34.6 Mixed 60.8 SusWrite 79.7 18% 82.6 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 1.4 22% 6.37 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 96%
WDC WD32 00BEVT-22A23T0 320GB 76GB free, PID 8017 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 7.4 7.2 7.2 8 9.5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	5.97% Terrible	Read 13.2 Write 13.8 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 7.2 15% 11.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 38% 0.4 MB/s

Generic Flash Disk 16GB 18,883 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 14GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 3 3.2 3.5 3 3.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	2.71% Terrible	Read 10.6 Write 2 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 2.9 6% 5.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.71% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1GB 4,189 User benchmarks, average bench 13% null MHz 512, 1024 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	4.45% Terrible	MC Read 1.2 MC Write 0.6 MC Mixed 0.4 2% 0.73 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 2 SC Mixed 0.4 3% 0.97 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.45% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16