Asus F2A55-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics43.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus F2A55-M  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '19 at 07:50
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 81.9
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 132
58% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 195
24% 186 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.8.1
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.2% Average
Lighting 51.7
Reflection 55.6
Parallax 63
42% 56.8 fps
MRender 62.8
Gravity 54.2
Splatting 50.8
45% 55.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 126 126 129 127 133 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.3% Average
Read 240
Write 131
Mixed 160
SusWrite 136
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 21.5
89% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 49.7
DQ Write 61
DQ Mixed 49.6
39% 53.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
453GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 121 124 124 124 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70% Good
Read 121
Write 122
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 123
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 70%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
718GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 177 179 181 182 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 156
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 176
100% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
128% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 16GB
1600, 1600, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.2% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 10.9
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 10.7
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A55-M Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A55-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $161
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback