Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180408
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 16 '19 at 22:05
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$170
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 61.6
1-Core 76.5
2-Core 168
58% 102 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 270
33% 249 Pts
64-Core 275
18% 275 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250
Device(0000 0000) 896MB
Ram: 896MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
7.45% Terrible
Lighting 34.1
Reflection 22.6
Parallax 15.6
9% 24.1 fps
MRender 19.9
Gravity 26.8
Splatting 14.9
7% 20.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.45%
Great: 8%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507KC4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 131 120 130 128 123 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 294
Write 192
Mixed 197
SusWrite 126
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 18.5
4K Mixed 15.4
50% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 16.9
DQ Write 36.3
DQ Mixed 19.7
17% 24.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 87%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
39GB free
Firmware: JF100-19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 49.5
Write 55
Mixed 38
SusWrite 44
34% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 42%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
365GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 62 64 63 64 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 82.5
Write 85
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 62.6
51% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 52%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
24GB free, PID 5100
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 25 25 24 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 100
Write 34.8
Mixed 23
SusWrite 24.2
50% 45.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 24%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
37GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 35
Write 35.5
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 35.6
45% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 17.4
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 16.5
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 689 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $890
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $299Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback