| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus P5K (all builds) |
| Memory | 1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20070703 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 16 '19 at 16:25 |
| Run Duration | 178 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
47.9%
Average
|
38% 53.3 Pts
|
15% 110 Pts
|
7% 109 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT
Device(0000 0000) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1
|
2.44%
Terrible
|
2% 2.8 fps
|
3% 3.92 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
33% 150 MB/s
|
50% 15 MB/s
|
16% 36.3 MB/s
| |
|
|
32% 42 MB/s
|
185% 1.33 MB/s
| ||
|
|
45% 59.1 MB/s
|
144% 0.97 MB/s
| ||
|
|
20% 26 MB/s
|
132% 1.47 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
512, 1024, 512, 1024 MB
|
18.5%
Very poor
|
16% 5.5 GB/s
|
16% 5.43 GB/s
|
47% 85.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5K Builds (Compare 356 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5K - $65
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 91x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 34x |
| Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 24x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 13x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 13x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 46% - Average | Total price: $285 |