Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 15 '19 at 23:17
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD FX-8370-$154
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.9% Above average
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 167
59% 126 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 559
55% 437 Pts
64-Core 555
37% 555 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$148
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Lighting 104
Reflection 72.8
Parallax 108
27% 94.9 fps
MRender 76.8
Gravity 110
Splatting 0.3
30% 62.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$42
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 190 201 203 201 204 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 373
Write 158
Mixed 272
SusWrite 195
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 25.6
88% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 214
172% 242 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 103%
Samsung HD320KJ 320GB
276GB free
Firmware: CP10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 72 75 72 70 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 70.5
Write 29
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 71.6
35% 48.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 45%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 182 193 191 192 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 142
Mixed 90.8
SusWrite 184
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
847GB free
Firmware: CC3E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 68 70 67 60 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 115
Write 79.5
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 65
61% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 67%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 38.2
Write 35.8
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 36.9
50% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.2
162% 2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 18.1
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 13.8
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 79%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 9,733 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $540
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback