Intel TigerLake U DDR4 SODIMM RVP

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Intel Tiger Lake Client Platform
Motherboard	Intel TigerLake U DDR4 SODIMM RVP (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190805
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 15 '19 at 17:17
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%
CPU Throttled	83%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel 0000 5 User benchmarks, average bench 66% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Memory 63.4 1-Core 150 2-Core 294 88% 169 Pts	4-Core 559 8-Core 700 81% 629 Pts	64-Core 696 43% 696 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics, Gen12 LP ReleaseInternal 2 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7100 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	6.44% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 8.65 Parallax 15 6% 10.1 fps	MRender 12.5 Gravity 17.5 Splatting 3.3 8% 11.1 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.44% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 425GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 898 928 943 829 57 88 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	215% Outstanding	Read 1,410 Write 942 Mixed 880 SusWrite 624 215% 964 MB/s	4K Read 62.9 4K Write 194 4K Mixed 83.1 304% 113 MB/s	DQ Read 331 DQ Write 861 DQ Mixed 222 276% 471 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 215% Great: 209%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7 16,591 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 5GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 8.3 8.8 8.2 8.1 8.2 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 28.8 Write 8.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 8.2 13% 12.4 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.2 80% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GB 132 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.1% Good	MC Read 25.7 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 18.5 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 28.7 SC Mixed 14.9 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Intel TigerLake U DDR4 SODIMM RVP

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)