Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FL_A412FL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FL_A412FL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X412FL
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 15 '19 at 14:38
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 31%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 114
2-Core 239
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 555
58% 468 Pts
64-Core 405
25% 405 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1F0E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6519
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.72% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 7.06
5% 9.32 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 16
10% 11.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.72%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 852 907 173 83 90 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 647
Write 808
Mixed 593
SusWrite 366
136% 603 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 52.3
164% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 582
DQ Mixed 219
232% 375 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 120%
Great: 209%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
4GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1.5 3.6 2.5 2.4 3.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 20.2
Write 2.2
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 2.4
7% 7.53 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 017A 76.B305G.D500B 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.1% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.8
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 10.7
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FL_A412FL Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FL_A412FL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback