PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H61M-DG3/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131118 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 15 '19 at 12:26 |
Run Duration | 165 Seconds |
Run User | EST-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-3240
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
57.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53.5%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB
254GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.03V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 81 58 59 75 77 MB/s
|
40.9%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
34GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 80 79 92 87 MB/s
|
47.3%
Average
|
|||
Seagate M3 Portable 1TB
80GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 26 27 27 27 MB/s
|
14.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
6GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 3 3.3 2.7 3.2 3.5 MB/s
|
2.69%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT51264BA160BJ.M8F 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
22.3%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 21x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 18x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 11x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 21x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 9x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $105 |