Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics32.3% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive278% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '19 at 07:41
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
1-Core 134
2-Core 265
94% 200 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 871
88% 697 Pts
64-Core 1,052
71% 1,052 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36C8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Lighting 133
Reflection 111
Parallax 123
34% 122 fps
MRender 81.3
Gravity 118
Splatting 79.3
30% 92.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 36%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 1000GB SSD
900GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS303121
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1636 1022 1046 1046 1033 1049 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 1,880
Write 2,517
Mixed 1683
SusWrite 1,139
407% 1,805 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 67.6
236% 85.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,443
DQ Write 1,274
DQ Mixed 1,344
1,011% 1,353 MB/s
Poor: 166%
This bench: 278%
Great: 281%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$105
71GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 449 370 336 327 321 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 450
Mixed 399
SusWrite 377
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 96.6
4K Mixed 58.9
193% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 207
156% 209 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$59
31GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 97 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 56.1
Write 65.3
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 98.5
49% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST3500320NS 500GB-$60
158GB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 83 84 84 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 81.9
Write 12.8
Mixed 35.1
SusWrite 83
39% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
151GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 74 77 78 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 110
Write 87.4
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 75.9
65% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$83
53GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 62 68 67 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 90.1
Write 86.5
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 66
54% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$66
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 35.3
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 35
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 110%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 2,102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 133%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,088
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $278Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $195Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $215
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $630SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback