HP Pavilion Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80B5
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150902
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateAug 15 '19 at 03:43
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Memory 54.1
1-Core 44.4
2-Core 84.5
38% 61 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 136
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 134
9% 134 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
HP(103C 80B5) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
4.24% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 20.6
Parallax 24.4
0% 15 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 17
4% 15 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.24%
Great: 5%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$50
569GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 54
Write 28.2
Mixed 20.8
25% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
41% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 62%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 M471B1G73EB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.7% Poor
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 12.9
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 8
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Pavilion Notebook Builds (Compare 36,099 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: HP Pavilion Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $322Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback