Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 23:06
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Memory 39.4
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 129
44% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 182
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
ASRock(1849 1313) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.6.2
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 4.81
Parallax 7.47
3% 5.16 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 3.91
4% 4.54 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.88
2% 2.44 fps
MRender 2.76
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 2.04
2% 2.38 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUS724020ALE641 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MJ6OA3Y0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 116 105 112 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 132
Write 110
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 111
69% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 205
20% 205 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88M Extreme4+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $130
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback