Lenovo 80TJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80TJ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Nano 5A8
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160818
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 22:25
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-7210 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
28% Poor
Memory 46.4
1-Core 24.6
2-Core 47.7
26% 39.6 Pts
4-Core 59.4
8-Core 51.1
8% 55.2 Pts
64-Core 64.1
4% 64.1 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Legend(17AA 380F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.7.1
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
796GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 64 84 80 81 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 26.4
Write 106
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 74.5
48% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 7.2
18% 6.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 4.5
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80TJ Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80TJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $30
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback