Lenovo 80TJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 25%
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80TJ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Nano 5A8
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160818
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 22:25
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A4-7210 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Memory 46.4
1-Core 14.4
2-Core 19.6
21% 26.8 Pts
4-Core 47.4
8-Core 54.4
7% 50.9 Pts
64-Core 80.1
5% 80.1 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Legend(17AA 380F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.7.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.1% Terrible
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 24.4
4% 18.4 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 13.9
5% 14.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.1%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
796GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 64 84 80 81 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 26.4
Write 106
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 74.5
48% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 7.2
18% 6.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 4.5
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 80TJ Builds (Compare 453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80TJ

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback