Fujitsu ESPRIMO C710

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.9% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
4 days ago, 3 days ago.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO C710  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3164-A1
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 22:25
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-3470-$136
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59% Above average
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 192
69% 145 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 373
51% 371 Pts
64-Core 373
25% 373 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Asus(1043 862C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Lighting 42.8
Reflection 36.1
Parallax 33.4
12% 37.4 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 33
13% 31.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 13%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKJF240A5L 240GB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LTVi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 194 263 189 164 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 352
Write 246
Mixed 265
SusWrite 198
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 32.7
107% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 131
133% 217 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 87%
Crucial BX200 480GB-$180
87GB free
Firmware: MU02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 209 144 70 68 68 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.4% Above average
Read 251
Write 244
Mixed 106
SusWrite 127
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 26.7
88% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 62.8
DQ Mixed 125
90% 120 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 96%
Samsung SSD_840_EVO 120GB
38GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 139 144 144 144 144 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
159% Outstanding
Read 362
Write 276
Mixed 308
SusWrite 168
362% 278 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 19.8
1,466% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 21.4
DQ Write 25.9
DQ Mixed 22.7
1,732% 23.3 MB/s
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.9
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 59%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical ESPRIMO C710 Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO C710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $167
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback