Asus TUF B360-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive29.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
4 days ago, 4 days ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 22:24
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-9700K
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
1-Core 141
2-Core 279
99% 210 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 843
90% 703 Pts
64-Core 1,034
69% 1,034 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 110%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$30
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 168 160 175 191 163 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.7% Poor
Read 166
Write 102
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 178
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 8.5
38% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 16.6
DQ Write 19.8
DQ Mixed 17.3
13% 17.9 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 95%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
107GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 328 298 265 322 310 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 370
Write 369
Mixed 346
SusWrite 306
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 23.9
77% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 197
144% 188 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 96%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$195
866GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1548 1392 1472 1267 1310 1277 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
340% Outstanding
Read 2,569
Write 2,230
Mixed 1,802
SusWrite 1,378
447% 1,995 MB/s
4K Read 61.5
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 83.9
274% 94.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,610
DQ Write 1,436
DQ Mixed 1,102
942% 1,383 MB/s
Poor: 239%
This bench: 340%
Great: 379%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$195
931GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 738 805 685 571 773 739 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 1,394
Write 1,231
Mixed 1,198
SusWrite 718
255% 1,135 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 82
270% 93.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,633
DQ Write 1,420
DQ Mixed 1,536
1,149% 1,530 MB/s
Poor: 239%
This bench: 251%
Great: 379%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$75
602GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 118 121 122 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 97.2
Write 76
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 120
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.5% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 106%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical TUF B360-PRO GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $748
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback