User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemECT
MotherboardClevo P7xxDM(-G)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151023
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 21:39
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 126
2-Core 247
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 689
69% 561 Pts
64-Core 687
42% 687 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Clevo(1558 7702) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Lighting 42
Reflection 42.2
Parallax 37.9
34% 40.7 fps
MRender 43.4
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 35.3
32% 39.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 39 38 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.2% Below average
Read 191
Write 113
Mixed 136
SusWrite 41.8
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 15.1
74% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 66.8
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 58.4
53% 78.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 75%
Transcend MTS800 M.2 256GB-$141
45GB free
Firmware: O1225G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 178 128 128 128 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 477
Write 377
Mixed 326
SusWrite 165
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 42.9
147% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 192
146% 200 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
644GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 100 97 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57% Above average
Read 99.4
Write 91.5
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 99
63% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback