User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemECT
MotherboardClevo P7xxDM(-G)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151023
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 21:39
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-6700K-$269
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
73.7% Very good
1-Core 120
2-Core 232
83% 176 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 626
67% 519 Pts
64-Core 658
44% 658 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Clevo(1558 7702) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
32% Below average
Lighting 126
Reflection 110
Parallax 121
32% 119 fps
MRender 91.1
Gravity 121
Splatting 81.2
32% 97.7 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 39 38 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.2% Below average
Read 191
Write 113
Mixed 136
SusWrite 41.8
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 15.1
74% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 66.8
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 58.4
53% 78.2 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 87%
Transcend MTS800 M.2 256GB-$140
45GB free
Firmware: O1225G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 178 128 128 128 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 477
Write 377
Mixed 326
SusWrite 165
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 42.9
147% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 192
146% 200 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$52
644GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 100 97 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57% Above average
Read 99.4
Write 91.5
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 99
63% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 42%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $196AMD RX 580 $167Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback