Zoostorm 7200-5170A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Zoostorm 7200-5170A (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte H81M-S2V
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150930
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '19 at 21:25
Run Duration	263 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 85.6 2-Core 173 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 340 42% 322 Pts	64-Core 362 22% 362 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Nvidia(10DE 0995) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Lighting 23.5 Reflection 22.8 Parallax 33 19% 26.4 fps	MRender 32.3 Gravity 28.1 Splatting 23.7 22% 28 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,374 Write 4,225 Mixed 4,203 954% 4,267 MB/s	4K Read 284 4K Write 191 4K Mixed 214 806% 230 MB/s	DQ Read 930 DQ Write 785 DQ Mixed 854 641% 856 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 283GB free Firmware: SC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 106 106 104 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 101 Write 93.2 Mixed 53.3 SusWrite 105 64% 88.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 60%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 708GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 96 97 96 97 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 133 Write 83.8 Mixed 78.2 SusWrite 96.1 72% 97.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GB 11,058 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	59.8% Above average	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 18.6 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 18.8 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 7200-5170A Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: Zoostorm 7200-5170A

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	9x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	7x
RTX 3050Nvidia $278Bench 75%, 43,922 samples	2x
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	1x

SSD
CS1311 120GBPNY $63Bench 75%, 12,393 samples	1x
SA400S37960G 960GBKingstonBench 70%, 56,609 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
CT102464BA160B.C16 1x8GBCrucialBench 30%, 12,839 samples	5x
CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 11,058 samples	2x
CT102464BA160B.C16 1315 CT102464BD160B.C16 16GBUnknownBench 55%, 261 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $456

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16