Gigabyte GA-N3050ND3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.68%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-N3050ND3H  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160411
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 19:42
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Celeron N3050
¯¯¯¯¯¯SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
6.68% Terrible
1-Core 16.5
2-Core 30.9
11% 23.7 Pts
4-Core 33.1
8-Core 33.3
5% 33.2 Pts
64-Core 32.3
2% 32.3 Pts
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.68%
Great: 11%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.15% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 7.8
2% 6.53 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 5
Splatting 7.1
2% 5.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.15%
Great: 3%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 66 65 58 55 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 366
Write 335
Mixed 180
SusWrite 82.6
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 11.5
51% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 72.4
DQ Write 66.8
DQ Mixed 54.4
45% 64.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 80%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$36
169GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 87 89 88 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 96.3
Write 79.8
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 84.7
55% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 57%
Generic- SD/MMC 32GB
16GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 9.9 10 11 11 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
9.99% Terrible
Read 17.6
Write 11.3
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 10.7
17% 13 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.6
149% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.99%
Great: 17%
Patriot Memory 16GB
14GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 5.9 4.6 4.4 3.4 4.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
6.59% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 11.7
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 4.8
14% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
67% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.59%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT4G3S160BM.M16FKD 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 5.3
17% 6.07 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.3
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 30%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical GA-N3050ND3H Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-N3050ND3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $35
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $233Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $82SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback