Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 55% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	60.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190729
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '19 at 14:13
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$82 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Memory 83.3 1-Core 145 2-Core 290 94% 173 Pts	4-Core 451 8-Core 797 75% 624 Pts	64-Core 1065 66% 1065 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 366A) CLim: 1619 MHz, MLim: 1790 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Lighting 77.6 Reflection 77.7 Parallax 68.2 63% 74.5 fps	MRender 76 Gravity 71.3 Splatting 61.5 56% 69.6 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: 583ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 94 85 94 90 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 264 Write 127 Mixed 171 SusWrite 93.4 36% 164 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 37.3 134% 53.4 MB/s	DQ Read 93.9 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 97.5 77% 105 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 73%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 430GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 142 153 153 153 153 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Read 163 Write 148 Mixed 32.5 SusWrite 150 89% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 107%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 0GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 31.9 Write 11.2 Mixed 15 21% 19.4 MB/s	4K Read 8.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1 78% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3200 2OZ 2x8GB 3,074 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	MC Read 41.7 MC Write 24.3 MC Mixed 39.2 100% 35.1 GB/s	SC Read 25.4 SC Write 24.3 SC Mixed 36.4 82% 28.7 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	835x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	627x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	291x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	295x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	237x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	225x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	101x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	90x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	72x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	179x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	134x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	126x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $474

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16