M625a SIS662

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.008% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 11 years old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardM625a SIS662  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 14:11
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core2 4400-$108
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Memory 45.9
1-Core 31.1
2-Core 62.1
30% 46.4 Pts
4-Core 62.7
8-Core 62.7
9% 62.7 Pts
64-Core 62
4% 62 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon X1550
MSI(1462 0682) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver.
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
0.008% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 1
0% 1.27 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.008%
Great: 0%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung SP0411N 40GB-$30
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TW100-11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 42 42 44 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 43.3
Write 48.6
Mixed 33.6
SusWrite 41.7
31% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
9.17% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.77 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 3.1
7% 2.6 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.17%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical SIS662 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%

Motherboard: M625a SIS662

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $109
The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $192Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $151Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $328Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $47
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback