Gigabyte GA-H81M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140708
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 14:11
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-4590-$189
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
62.9% Good
1-Core 91
2-Core 197
67% 144 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 392
54% 393 Pts
64-Core 374
25% 374 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$359
Asus(1043 8623) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Lighting 371
Reflection 350
Parallax 410
119% 377 fps
MRender 203
Gravity 373
Splatting 240
119% 272 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 119%
Great: 128%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$110
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 409
Write 428
Mixed 357
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 60
184% 68.6 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 357
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 114%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$103
283GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 403 426 429 408 413 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 403
Mixed 372
SusWrite 405
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 61.1
198% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 121%
Great: 135%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
99GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 114 113 115 113 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 174
Write 137
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 114
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.3
253% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
364GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 92 90 88 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 70.7
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 89.9
58% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D18ADS3.16FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
61.9% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 20.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 72%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical GA-H81M-D3H Builds (Compare 250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $250
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $233Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $82SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback