Asrock H170M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.2% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
3 days ago, 3 days ago.
MotherboardAsrock H170M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 14:10
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-6600K-$210
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.6% Above average
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 190
68% 145 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 289
39% 287 Pts
64-Core 216
14% 216 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3201) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
40.2% Average
Lighting 134
Reflection 111
Parallax 123
40% 123 fps
MRender 80.2
Gravity 117
Splatting 82.8
40% 93.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 45%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE200 SSD 120GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM21.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 141 122 192 187 200 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 332
Write 194
Mixed 170
SusWrite 160
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 12.1
57% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 71.2
81% 135 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 84%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
25GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 122 62 113 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 116
Write 111
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 105
72% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 78%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB
335GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 86.5
Write 79
Mixed 32.8
79% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$62
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
63.1% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 21.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 14.6
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 89%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical H170M Pro4 Builds (Compare 759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock H170M Pro4 - $118

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $773
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $233Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $82SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback