Asrock H170M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H170M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 14:10
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 200
69% 124 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 290
40% 297 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3201) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.4% Below average
Lighting 44.5
Reflection 42.8
Parallax 38.4
36% 41.9 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 39
Splatting 36
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE200 SSD 120GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM21.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 141 122 192 187 200 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 332
Write 194
Mixed 170
SusWrite 160
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 12.1
57% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 71.2
81% 135 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 82%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
25GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 122 62 113 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 116
Write 111
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 105
72% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 76%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB
335GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 86.5
Write 79
Mixed 32.8
79% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
63.1% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 21.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 14.6
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M Pro4 Builds (Compare 314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H170M Pro4 - $118

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $326
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback