Asus H97M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
3 days ago, 3 days ago.
MotherboardAsus H97M-E  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160328
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 13:59
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-4460-$190
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.1% Above average
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 187
66% 140 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 352
48% 351 Pts
64-Core 350
24% 350 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 60%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 452
Write 350
Mixed 105
66% 302 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 37.4
134% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 93.4
DQ Mixed 172
132% 186 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$38
204GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 141 136 139 141 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 190
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 139
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 93%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
60.8% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.6
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 63%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 4,624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $808
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $233Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $82SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback