Sony SVE14A2X1EH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemSony SVE14A2X1EH  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 13:55
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 85
2-Core 136
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 204
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sony(104D 9096) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 12.104.0.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.62% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 4.42
Parallax 2.78
3% 3.73 fps
MRender 5.14
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.57
4% 4.99 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.62%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
600GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX0A3H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 84 86 86 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 88.7
Write 83.8
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 84.6
53% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.8% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 18.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback