Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 11:21
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 83.9
1-Core 158
2-Core 309
99% 184 Pts
4-Core 600
8-Core 1,185
105% 892 Pts
64-Core 2202
136% 2202 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
MSI(1462 3713) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 231
Reflection 236
Parallax 248
188% 238 fps
Gravity 225
Splatting 144
158% 184 fps
Poor: 128% Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
781GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 947 1185 1172 1150 1134 1116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 2,554
Write 2,392
Mixed 1,633
SusWrite 1,117
430% 1,924 MB/s
4K Read 68.4
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 96.4
324% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 63.4
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 91.8
77% 109 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 277%
Great: 372%
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
420GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 430 427 427 432 430 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 426
Mixed 406
SusWrite 428
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 48.1
163% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 31.4
DQ Write 84.6
DQ Mixed 44.6
38% 53.5 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 123%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$146
1.5TB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 347 346 341 345 343 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 428
Mixed 400
SusWrite 344
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 49.4
163% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 31.6
DQ Write 83
DQ Mixed 45.6
38% 53.4 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
550GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 155 154 154 156 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 154
Mixed 95.2
SusWrite 155
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
362GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 111 113 121 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 112
Write 190
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 117
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
392GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 90 92 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 111
Write 91.1
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 90.9
64% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 45.8
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 41.5
121% 42.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 37.5
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 114%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $475

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,741
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback