Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
2 months ago, 9 days ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 11:16
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
1-Core 122
2-Core 236
84% 179 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 878
84% 673 Pts
64-Core 1,243
83% 1,243 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$150
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Lighting 118
Reflection 79.4
Parallax 120
31% 106 fps
MRender 80
Gravity 113
Splatting 81.6
30% 91.6 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 230 230 221 215 207 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 481
Write 253
Mixed 263
SusWrite 226
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 34.7
117% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 211
191% 294 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$82
456GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 83 86 83 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 102
Write 86
Mixed 77
SusWrite 84.4
65% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$42
813GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 169 177 174 177 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 163
Mixed 94
SusWrite 176
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$77
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 35
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 30.2
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 25.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 97%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 18,823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $713
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198AMD RX 580 $173Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback