MSI B450 Tomahawk

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive282% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 19 days ago, 19 days ago, 19 days ago, 19 days ago, 19 days ago, 18 days ago, 18 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 14 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 11 days ago, 10 days ago, 10 days ago, 10 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 7 days ago, 7 days ago, 7 days ago, 7 days ago, 7 days ago, 7 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 3 days ago, 3 days ago, 3 days ago, 3 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 1 day ago, 1 day ago, 1 day ago, 1 day ago, 1 day ago, 1 day ago, 19 hrs ago, 14 hrs ago, 13 hrs ago, 13 hrs ago, 6 hrs ago, 4 hrs ago, 4 hrs ago, 4 hrs ago, 3 hrs ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 Tomahawk  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 11:11
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
85.9% Excellent
1-Core 121
2-Core 242
85% 182 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 929
87% 706 Pts
64-Core 1,369
92% 1,369 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-Super-$550
EVGA(3842 3071) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Lighting 492
Reflection 396
Parallax 522
128% 470 fps
MRender 419
Gravity 420
Splatting 267
117% 369 fps
Poor: 98%
This bench: 123%
Great: 122%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$140
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1130 1029 937 940 942 940 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 2,570
Write 1977
Mixed 1,520
SusWrite 986
393% 1,763 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 78
256% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,027
DQ Write 716
DQ Mixed 523
485% 755 MB/s
Poor: 208%
This bench: 282%
Great: 387%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$75
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 159 154 162 166 167 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 130
Write 152
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 162
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.4
178% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSB.16FBD2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3066 MHz clocked @ 1533 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 36.9
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.3
SC Write 41.6
SC Mixed 32.5
97% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 109%
Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $571
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198AMD RX 580 $173Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback