Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	65.8% Good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 73.8 2-Core 146 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 290 38% 286 Pts	64-Core 290 18% 290 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 0504) 2GB Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.9% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 1.41 2% 1.53 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.87 2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.9% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109 10,807 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2333000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 167 174 175 176 176 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 360 Write 167 Mixed 184 SusWrite 174 49% 221 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 40.7 4K Mixed 10.2 50% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 67.8 79% 135 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB 6,386 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	48.5% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 13.8 38% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 75.3 53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	168x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	50x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	50x

RAM
ACR512X64D3S13C9G 2x4GBKingstonBench 44%, 888 samples	20x
ACR512X64D3S13C9G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 1,571 samples	19x
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 42%, 3,068 samples	13x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $228

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16