Asus P8H67-M LE

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M LE (all builds)
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110823
Uptime	4.8 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '19 at 03:20
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	49%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2120-$170 77,810 User benchmarks, average bench 51% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Memory 51.2 1-Core 24.7 2-Core 105 35% 60.3 Pts	4-Core 127 8-Core 174 19% 150 Pts	64-Core 132 8% 132 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520 16,336 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.77% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.58 Parallax 0.81 2% 1.86 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 1.83 2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.77% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: 525ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 64 65 64 63 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	23.6% Poor	Read 71.5 Write 91 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 65.1 18% 77.3 MB/s	4K Read 9 4K Write 28.2 4K Mixed 14.8 48% 17.3 MB/s	DQ Read 20.6 DQ Write 60.9 DQ Mixed 16.7 20% 32.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 73%
Seagate ST1000NM0055-1V410C 1TB 516 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 249GB free Firmware: TN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 67 71 75 67 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 157 Write 149 Mixed 84 SusWrite 70.4 85% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 1.2 264% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 119%
Philips USB Flash Drive 32GB 137 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 11GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.7 3.8 3.5 3 3.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	2.49% Terrible	Read 8 Write 2.5 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 3.4 4% 3.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.49% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-006.A01LF 8GB 174 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 13.8 40% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 8.4 21% 7.47 GB/s	Latency 156 26% 156 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M LE Builds (Compare 531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M LE

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	71x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	71x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	57x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	46x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	24x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x

RAM
CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 8GBCorsairBench 43%, 520 samples	22x
CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 8GBCorsairBench 48%, 288 samples	14x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16