Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics93.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '19 at 23:28
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 77.4
1-Core 149
2-Core 299
94% 175 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 993
96% 792 Pts
64-Core 1,457
90% 1,457 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Asus(1043 868B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.68
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 116
Parallax 109
98% 115 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 102
Splatting 86.5
86% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
686GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1268 1273 1336 1367 1364 1367 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 1,474
Write 1347
Mixed 1,038
SusWrite 1,329
292% 1,297 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 67.9
254% 92.1 MB/s
DQ Read 629
DQ Write 786
DQ Mixed 270
325% 562 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 249%
Great: 255%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
122GB free
Firmware: 505CUA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 223 218 219 228 180 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 340
Write 272
Mixed 271
SusWrite 218
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 26
87% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 136
124% 191 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 85%
Corsair Force GT 240GB-$499
9GB free
Firmware: 5.03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 388
Write 218
Mixed 281
65% 296 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 26.8
93% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 142
128% 194 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 92%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
489GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 87 87 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 109
Write 112
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 88.2
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 62%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
408GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 141 142 142 143 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 142
Write 160
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 142
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2Z3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.2% Very good
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 31.9
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 30.1
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback