Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '19 at 21:32
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 114
58% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 374
39% 313 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
Nvidia(10DE 12A6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 145
Parallax 145
99% 137 fps
MRender 166
Gravity 133
Splatting 98.7
105% 133 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 101%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 141 141 142 138 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 489
Write 449
Mixed 304
SusWrite 156
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 44.7
152% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 147
138% 215 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
506GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 141 139 138 139 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 158
Write 151
Mixed 97
SusWrite 139
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
230% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
3.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 190 188 192 186 191 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609ES2LX0. 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.7% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 18.8
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 12.7
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback