PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 (all builds) |
Memory | 7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161108 |
Uptime | 2 Days |
Run Date | Aug 13 '19 at 19:54 |
Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 46% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
|
72.9%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 85D2) 2GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 109 12 72 56 5.6 MB/s
|
29%
Poor
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
248GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 120 121 121 121 MB/s
|
71%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSEK.8FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
56.2%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 477x |
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 79x |
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples | 76x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 91x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 84x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 74x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $899 |