Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Pavilion Laptop 14-bf0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 83A3
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180704
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '19 at 13:15
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7200U 205,332 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 87.1 1-Core 57.5 2-Core 130 57% 91.5 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 178 24% 176 Pts	64-Core 185 12% 185 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 58%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GB 12,432 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4120006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 197 189 195 191 188 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 393 Write 363 Mixed 221 SusWrite 191 65% 292 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 43.8 4K Mixed 27.6 77% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 329 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 202 173% 256 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB 144,145 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.1% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 10.4 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 11 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 70.4 57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	156x
940MXNvidiaBench 9%, 36,213 samples	19x
HD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 9,913 samples	9x

SSD
MZNLN256HMHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 91%, 5,596 samples	41x
SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 10,347 samples	30x
SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 70%, 12,432 samples	11x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	33x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	26x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 31%, 10,211 samples	12x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16