Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive386% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '19 at 08:47
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 70.3
1-Core 154
2-Core 298
92% 174 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 1,184
105% 889 Pts
64-Core 2,194
136% 2,194 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 136
Parallax 116
105% 127 fps
MRender 96.5
Gravity 124
Splatting 101
87% 107 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2129 2140 2134 2121 2117 2100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
386% Outstanding
Read 2,728
Write 2,120
Mixed 1,391
SusWrite 2,123
468% 2,090 MB/s
4K Read 61.5
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 85.8
304% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,274
DQ Write 1,126
DQ Mixed 1,209
904% 1,203 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 386%
Great: 393%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
0GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 405
Write 226
Mixed 248
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 47.2
169% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 193
140% 181 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 87%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
577GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 103 102 102 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 107
Write 121
Mixed 76
SusWrite 101
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 86%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
148GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 140 138 138 139 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 114
Write 109
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 139
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 108%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 64GB-$25
32GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 24 26 24 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 214
Write 26.5
Mixed 76
SusWrite 25.6
87% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 10.9
852% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 15.9
DQ Write 20.5
DQ Mixed 12
1,164% 16.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.1% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 28.1
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 27.3
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,069
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback