Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus Z10PE-D16 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160622
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '19 at 06:22
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Memory 54
1-Core 72.1
2-Core 149
51% 91.7 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 580
51% 434 Pts
64-Core 1,729
107% 1,729 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.1% Above average
Lighting 58.4
Reflection 92.1
Parallax 87
48% 79.2 fps
MRender 91.1
Gravity 93.4
Splatting 83.7
73% 89.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 164 125 58 49 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 438
Write 408
Mixed 364
SusWrite 142
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 44.1
145% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 327
248% 335 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 134%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
978GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
65% Good
Read 189
Write 7.8
Mixed 13.3
SusWrite 38.3
45% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
34.1% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 5.7
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PE-D16 WS Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $353
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback