| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Biostar A320MH (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190304 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 13 '19 at 04:28 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
53.3%
Above average
|
60% 103 Pts
|
28% 215 Pts
|
16% 257 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 550-$79
PowerColor(148C 2390) 2GB
CLim: 1190 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.10.1
|
17.6%
Very poor
|
16% 24.1 fps
|
22% 25.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 91 28 80 92 55 MB/s
|
64.3%
Good
|
56% 251 MB/s
|
111% 42.3 MB/s
|
135% 205 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSTK.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
91.7%
Outstanding
|
97% 33.9 GB/s
|
74% 25.8 GB/s
|
41% 97.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,804 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar A320MH
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 266x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 196x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 123x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 126x |
| Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples | 125x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 111x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $338 |