Asrock X370 Professional Gaming

Performance Results


Gaming 133% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 137% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Professional Gaming (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190803
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '19 at 03:14
Run Duration	264 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$199 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	91% Outstanding	Memory 71.3 1-Core 148 2-Core 299 91% 173 Pts	4-Core 592 8-Core 1,064 100% 828 Pts	64-Core 1,444 89% 1,444 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Gigabyte(1458 37BD) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	148% Outstanding	Lighting 200 Reflection 228 Parallax 222 163% 216 fps	MRender 247 Gravity 209 Splatting 138 156% 198 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 645 328 328 327 318 311 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	245% Outstanding	Read 2,197 Write 1,389 Mixed 626 SusWrite 376 252% 1,147 MB/s	4K Read 48.2 4K Write 204 4K Mixed 67.7 268% 107 MB/s	DQ Read 1,219 DQ Write 1128 DQ Mixed 680 646% 1,009 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 245% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 85GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 477 481 484 355 171 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 482 Mixed 408 SusWrite 409 101% 450 MB/s	4K Read 45.6 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 63.7 216% 77.7 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 360 272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 134%
Pcie SSD 1TB 40,637 User benchmarks, average bench 210% 917GB free Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1240 1037 1048 1047 1048 1050 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	222% Outstanding	Read 1,079 Write 1,360 Mixed 1,200 SusWrite 1,078 267% 1,179 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 31.5 180% 74.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,417 DQ Write 1,293 DQ Mixed 1,327 1,003% 1,345 MB/s
Poor: 112% ↑ This bench: 222% Great: 284%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750 12,067 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 9GB free Firmware: SD15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 92 97 82 79 90 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 97.3 Write 98 Mixed 51.2 SusWrite 88 61% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 66%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 38GB free Firmware: MS1OA7S0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 103 105 106 107 106 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Read 163 Write 152 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 106 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 141% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 103%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750 12,067 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 26GB free Firmware: SD15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 77 86 91 107 84 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	43% Average	Read 58.2 Write 63.5 Mixed 40 SusWrite 91.6 46% 63.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 66%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 9GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 71 55 75 83 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 50.2 Write 51 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 70.6 38% 51.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GX-D4-3200-MR 2x8GB 3,635 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.5% Good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 26.3 69% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 24.2 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 98.3 41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 92%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 90%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Professional Gaming

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	25x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	19x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	14x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	19x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	13x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	11x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 241%, 38,097 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
MX300 SATA M.2 1TBCrucial $65Bench 90%, 6,111 samples	4x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	5x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $752

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16