Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '19 at 14:55
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A4-4020 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
26.8% Poor
1-Core 59.3
2-Core 95.6
38% 77.4 Pts
4-Core 97.1
8-Core 95.9
13% 96.5 Pts
64-Core 102
7% 102 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2201.0
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.89% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 7.2
2% 8.67 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 9.2
2% 7.73 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.89%
Great: 2%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD WD2500AVVS-61L2B0 250GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 37 43 41 46 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 30.9
Write 37.3
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 40
25% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 34%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
363GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 38 44 42 46 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 97.3
Write 87.5
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 40.7
49% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
166% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 62%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
1.62% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.7
1% 0.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
33% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 1.62%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A 9905584-022.A 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.7% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 8
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8.9
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-F2A68HM-S1 Builds (Compare 2,714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 14% - Very poor Total price: $22
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback