PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1497 |
Memory | 1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110609 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Aug 12 '19 at 05:23 |
Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 83% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
43.4%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Gigabyte(1458 3515) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 381.65
|
15.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
301GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 6.4 6 6.1 7.2 8.8 MB/s
|
3.36%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
|
20.3%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 611x |
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 252x |
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 203x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 988x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 109x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 97x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |