Philco DTA-H61

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	17.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Philco DTA-H61 (all builds)
Memory	1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120315
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 12 '19 at 02:18
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	53%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2100-$49 63,701 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 84.8 1-Core 77.1 2-Core 137 61% 99.7 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 203 27% 203 Pts	64-Core 209 13% 209 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 61%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 207GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 127 136 137 134 118 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.9% Very poor	Read 79.6 Write 22.6 Mixed 65.3 SusWrite 124 16% 72.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 12.3 4K Mixed 3.8 18% 6.93 MB/s	DQ Read 21.4 DQ Write 50.2 DQ Mixed 28.3 24% 33.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 849GB free Firmware: CC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 194 192 192 190 182 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 183 Mixed 83.4 SusWrite 191 115% 158 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 112%
Samsung S2 Portable 320GB 1,030 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 100GB free, PID 1f03 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 24 29 28 28 27 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 32.7 Write 24.9 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 24.2 35% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 21%
Kingston DT 101 G2 32GB 323 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 24GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.2 3.1 4.1 3.3 3.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	4.21% Terrible	Read 15 Write 9.7 Mixed 3.3 SusWrite 3.7 9% 7.93 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.6 38% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.21% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	24.3% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 7.1 21% 7.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 7.2 21% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical DTA-H61 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Philco DTA-H61

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	5x
Core i5-2310Intel $90Bench 65%, 15,623 samples	2x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	1x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	2x
GeForce 9800 GTNvidiaBench 5%, 19,550 samples	1x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x

SSD
128GB SSD 128GBLexarBench 67%, 8,135 samples	2x
750 EVO 250GBSamsung $55Bench 94%, 75,831 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
SH564128FH8N0QNSCG 2x4GBSmartBench 54%, 310 samples	2x
M378B1G73EB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 3,888 samples	1x
SH564128FH8N0QHSCR 2x4GBSmartBench 47%, 391 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16