Medion E7214

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMedion E7214  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION E7214
Memory1.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '19 at 18:21
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
44.2% Average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 56.6
2-Core 110
47% 77.2 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 144
19% 142 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Wistron(17C0 10D9) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2622
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.62% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.88
Parallax 0.62
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 1.05
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.22
1% 0.92 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.62%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 89 89 90 90 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 189
Write 122
Mixed 150
SusWrite 89.9
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 17.2
60% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 94.9
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 96.8
76% 104 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59
176GB free
Firmware: PB3OC64G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 73 72 74 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 60.6
Write 58.1
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 73.3
41% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 42%
IS917 innostor 32GB
22GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
6.54% Terrible
Read 6.5
Write 15.7
Mixed 9
SusWrite 14.4
17% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
63% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 6.54%
Great: 31%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1TB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 25.3
Write 20.1
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 17.6
26% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT125S6TFR8C-G7 HMT112S6TFR8C-G7 3GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
23.5% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 8.9
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E7214 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E7214

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $199
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback