Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	44.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus H81M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150526
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '19 at 09:02
Run Duration	212 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	44%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90% Outstanding	Memory 92.1 1-Core 133 2-Core 269 91% 165 Pts	4-Core 489 8-Core 602 70% 546 Pts	64-Core 122 8% 122 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088 6,806 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Nvidia(10DE 1035) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.8% Average	Lighting 55.3 Reflection 54.7 Parallax 69.5 45% 59.8 fps	MRender 60.8 Gravity 59.1 Splatting 45.8 44% 55.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 1TB-$500 1,367 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 213GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 357 420 307 324 414 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Read 426 Write 406 Mixed 302 SusWrite 327 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 64.8 4K Mixed 30.3 109% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 78.5 DQ Mixed 101 83% 123 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 108%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 439GB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 139 142 138 141 141 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Read 135 Write 135 Mixed 107 SusWrite 132 94% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 87%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 530GB free Firmware: 1112 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 100 98 97 96 96 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 89 Write 94.4 Mixed 55.9 SusWrite 94.6 61% 83.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 62%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB 13,353 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 3TB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 117 121 119 122 117 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 65%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB 7,568 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 515GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 102 105 102 104 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	43.5% Average	Read 98.8 Write 99.7 Mixed 73.6 SusWrite 100 126% 93.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 106% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB 20,216 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	62.1% Good	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 19.8 61% 21.5 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 21 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 63.8 63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,847 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	563x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	387x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	236x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	266x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	208x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	169x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	98x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	82x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	80x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	100x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	56x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16