Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '19 at 02:43
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-5930K-$329
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
73.1% Very good
1-Core 105
2-Core 207
74% 156 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 682
70% 549 Pts
64-Core 808
54% 808 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$480
EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.60
Relative performance (0th percentile)
45.3% Average
Lighting 143
Reflection 143
Parallax 152
38% 146 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 145
Splatting 203
46% 180 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 86%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 1TB-$329
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 121 142 148 113 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 379
Write 146
Mixed 325
SusWrite 141
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 34.5
128% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 96.9
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 124
88% 111 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 103%
Seagate ST33000651NS 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: G009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 140 139 145 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 151
Write 148
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 142
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST33000651NS 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: G009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 147 145 145 146 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 146
Write 135
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 146
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
169GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 86 86 85 87 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 83.8
Write 86.3
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 86.2
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 91%
Toshiba MG03ACA300 3TB
996GB free
Firmware: FL1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 89 93 92 91 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 80.8
Write 87
Mixed 46
SusWrite 92.9
56% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 39.6
117% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 21
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $1,224
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $159Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $338Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback