Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	Memory 41.4 1-Core 41 2-Core 51.1 29% 44.5 Pts	4-Core 66.3 8-Core 58.1 8% 62.2 Pts	64-Core 56.9 4% 56.9 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 30%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK512TBN-1AR1ZABHA 512GB 1,111 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 455GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPC0016 SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 200 156 304 183 190 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.5% Below average	Read 253 Write 280 Mixed 232 SusWrite 210 55% 244 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 27.5 4K Mixed 10.2 40% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 96.8 DQ Mixed 101 76% 102 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMT3170NE68F9F1600 1x4GB 710 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 4.5 13% 4.53 GB/s	SC Read 0.8 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 1.1 6% 2.13 GB/s	Latency 196 20% 196 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	250x
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	175x
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	142x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	99x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	96x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	177x
RMT3170NE68F9F1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 18%, 710 samples	80x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	34x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16